Revised Glioblastoma Classification Should Improve Patient Care  

Share this news item:

Contact Us

For media inquiries:
614-293-3737

To find a doctor, get a referral or for information on a clinical trial:
614-293-5066
or 800-293-5066

Search for a clinical trial

Posted: 5/23/2012

<p>Dr. Arnab Chakravarti</p>

Dr. Arnab Chakravarti

Revised Glioblastoma Classification Should Improve Patient Care

  • The system doctors use to classify patients’ malignant brain tumors is outdated.
  • Researchers have revised the system to accommodate treatment advances and molecular markers.
  • The new system will be validated in future clinical trials for malignant gliomas.
COLUMBUS, Ohio – Radiation oncology researchers have revised the system used by doctors since the 1990s to determine the prognosis of people with glioblastoma, which is the most devastating of malignant brain tumors.
 
The outdated system was devised for glioblastoma and related brain tumors that were treated by radiation therapy only, and it relied on clinical signs and symptoms. It divided patients into six prognostic groups. The new system accommodates advances in treatment – particularly the use of radiation therapy plus the chemotherapy drug temozolomide – and it incorporates molecular biomarkers as well as clinical variables.
 
“The new model is more relevant and contemporary and should do a better job of identifying patients that require the most aggressive therapy,” says the study’s chair for Translational Research Dr. Arnab Chakravarti, professor of Radiation Oncology and co-director of the brain tumor program at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC – Jame
s).

Chakr
avarti will present the findings at the 2012 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago.
 
To devise the new system, Chakravarti and his colleagues compared tumor and healthy tissue from 162 glioblastoma patients who were treated under the Radiation Oncology Group clinical trial 0525 (RTOG 0525). The investigators profiled protein, messenger RNA and epigenetic changes in patients’ tumor cells looking for alterations in key signaling molecules.
 
They showed that high expression of the proteins called pAKT, c-met, and MGMT was associated with poor prognosis, while methylation of the MGMT gene, which codes for a DNA repair protein, was associated with a better prognosis.
 
“We hope to begin further studies to validate out classification system soon,” Chakravarti says.
 
Funding from the NIH/National Cancer Institute (grant CA148190-02) supported this research.
 
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute strives to create a cancer-free world by integrating scientific research with excellence in education and patient-centered care, a strategy that leads to better methods of prevention, detection and treatment. Ohio State is one of only 40 National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers and one of only seven centers funded by the NCI to conduct both phase I and phase II clinical trials. The NCI recently rated Ohio State’s cancer program as “exceptional,” the highest rating given by NCI survey teams. As the cancer program’s 210-bed adult patient-care component, The James is a “Top Hospital” as named by the Leapfrog Group and one of the top 20 cancer hospitals in the nation as ranke
d by U.S.News & World Report.
 
###
 
 
Contact: Darrell E. Ward, Medical Center Public Affairs and Media Relations,
614-293-3737, or Darrell.Ward@osumc.edu
 


Tags: Brain Cancer; Clinical/Translational Research; Research Findings

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC – James) 300 W. 10th Ave. Columbus, OH 43210 Phone: 1-800-293-5066 | Email: jamesline@osumc.edu